← Client stories

First-time overseas buyer

Matthias

Matthias was considering two off-plan properties in Punta Cana. Both were presented as strong investments, but the sales materials used different assumptions and left important questions unanswered. We compared the real costs, rental potential, payment terms and project risks before he committed.

0
Properties compared
0
Cost areas reviewed
0
Key risks identified
0 weeks
From intake to final analysis

“Both properties looked attractive, but I had no reliable way to compare them. DominicanVest showed me which numbers were assumptions, what information was missing and what I needed to ask before paying a deposit.”

Candid snapshot taken by a colleague on a property inspection day in the Dominican Republic. A European man in his early forties photographed from behind and slightly to one side, seated at a plastic-topped tableMatthiasEuropean investor · Germany

The challenge

Both projects advertised attractive rental returns, but their calculations were difficult to compare. Occupancy assumptions, recurring costs and management fees were either different or incomplete. Matthias could not clearly see which opportunity offered the stronger risk-adjusted return.

Our approach

We compared both properties using the same criteria, including the full purchase cost, payment terms, rental assumptions and recurring fees. We also reviewed delivery timelines, developer and project risks, and the contractual points that needed clarification before Matthias could make a decision.

What we found

The property with the highest advertised return was not automatically the strongest investment. Its projections relied on optimistic occupancy and cost assumptions, leaving less room for delays, lower demand or unexpected expenses. Another option offered a less aggressive headline return but provided clearer cost information, a more manageable payment schedule and a proposition that better matched Daniel’s preference for a lower-maintenance investment. The review also identified several items that required confirmation, including furnishing costs, rental-management fees, owner-use restrictions, delivery conditions and the treatment of recurring charges.

The decision

Matthias did not pay a deposit immediately. He first requested the missing documents and clear answers to the financial and contractual questions identified in the analysis.

The result

Matthias left with a clear comparison, a focused list of questions for the developers and a better framework for assessing future properties. Instead of making a decision based on the sales pitch, he could move forward from a position of control.

Before

Two attractive offers, inconsistent numbers and no reliable way to compare their true cost and risk.

After

A like-for-like comparison, clear risk areas and the exact questions to ask before committing.

This story reflects an individual client experience. Property investments involve risk, and DominicanVest does not guarantee returns or future results.

Considering a similar decision?

Every analysis starts with the opportunity you are actually looking at.